PHILIPSBURG, Sint Maarten — āIncrease in the interest rates if conditions are not met is exacerbating the already precarious situation of the countries and AGAINST our development.ā
In assessing where we are financially and economically, the DP leader did not mince any words when she firstly directed her view to the Dutch government: āEven though they areĀ in a care-takerās state, I continue to remind the Dutch government of their responsibility Ā to assist in our countryās sustainable growth.
Refinancing of Dutch loans amid threats if conditions are not met,Ā isĀ counterproductive in this context, illogical and rubbing salt in an open woundā.
Increase in the interest rates if conditions are not met is exacerbating the already precarious situation of the countries and against our development.
The MP elaborated her point with the example of the demand on Aruba: āCase in point, the condition placedĀ on Aruba for exampleĀ is a reversal of the principle of self-governance, one the tenets of the Right To Developmentā.
Closer to home, the latest addition to the conditions for debt refinancing is a multi-year economic framework.
āThis comes out of left field, when we consider that weĀ already have the report Spurring Economic Activity on the shelf. This report was commissioned and delivered as part of the country package. Is this serving as our economic blueprint going forward? If not, the question begs, why not?ā
Much in this report is known, but requires concrete action, the MP elaborated.Ā āImprove the investment climate,Ā be transparent in your investment requirements and your investment benefits, areĀ but some of the recommendations in the report Spurring Economic Development. I surmise that the government of St. Maarten has its own reasons why they donāt promote an open and transparent investment policyā.
In the opinion of MP. Wescot,Ā āAnother multi annual economic framework would just be added to the reports on the shelves. This government thrives in obscurity and lack of policy implementation. Ā The year 2023 thus far has been a financial disaster, created by the governmentā.
The Parliament was supposed to receive an amended budget 2023 since June. āIt isĀ because of that commitment by the government of St. Maarten back in April, Ā to provide an amended 2023 budget ASAP,Ā that the CFT gave the final green light forĀ the capital budget of government,Ā in orderĀ to get loans forĀ the capital investmentsĀ for the country.Ā What is still necessary and needed to be includedĀ in the amended budget 2023 would have been a multi annual projection of this capital budget.
āGovernment does not even have the decency to tell us why we have not yet received the 2023 amendedĀ budget. We have passed the halfway mark in this budgetary year that projectedĀ over 500 million income for 2023 and that was basedĀ on items like the Ā visitorsā tax forĀ 10 million guilders , ship registration fees, increase inĀ theĀ vehicle inspection fees, to name a few.
All of these were amounts which weĀ queried as to their feasibility on short term, but these queries were discounted .
Right now it is anyoneās guess how close we areĀ to these budgetary projections. Yet the government claims to have a (counter)proposal for debt refinancing, that it is keeping close to its chest. But when they get in a jam, by trying to outmaneuver their Dutch counterparts, then they know to run to parliament for support, MP Wescot concluded.
































