Home Headlines & Top Stories Dutch government mustĀ  respect the Right To Development (RTD) of the Caribbean...

Dutch government mustĀ  respect the Right To Development (RTD) of the Caribbean Countries in the Kingdom.

1927

 

PHILIPSBURG, Sint Maarten — ā€œIncrease in the interest rates if conditions are not met is exacerbating the already precarious situation of the countries and AGAINST our development.ā€

In assessing where we are financially and economically, the DP leader did not mince any words when she firstly directed her view to the Dutch government: ā€œEven though they areĀ  in a care-taker’s state, I continue to remind the Dutch government of their responsibility Ā to assist in our country’s sustainable growth.

Refinancing of Dutch loans amid threats if conditions are not met,Ā  isĀ counterproductive in this context, illogical and rubbing salt in an open woundā€.

Increase in the interest rates if conditions are not met is exacerbating the already precarious situation of the countries and against our development.

The MP elaborated her point with the example of the demand on Aruba: ā€œCase in point, the condition placedĀ  on Aruba for exampleĀ  is a reversal of the principle of self-governance, one the tenets of the Right To Developmentā€.

Closer to home, the latest addition to the conditions for debt refinancing is a multi-year economic framework.

ā€œThis comes out of left field, when we consider that weĀ  already have the report Spurring Economic Activity on the shelf. This report was commissioned and delivered as part of the country package. Is this serving as our economic blueprint going forward? If not, the question begs, why not?ā€

Much in this report is known, but requires concrete action, the MP elaborated.Ā  ā€œImprove the investment climate,Ā  be transparent in your investment requirements and your investment benefits, areĀ  but some of the recommendations in the report Spurring Economic Development. I surmise that the government of St. Maarten has its own reasons why they don’t promote an open and transparent investment policyā€.

In the opinion of MP. Wescot,Ā  ā€œAnother multi annual economic framework would just be added to the reports on the shelves. This government thrives in obscurity and lack of policy implementation. Ā  The year 2023 thus far has been a financial disaster, created by the governmentā€.

The Parliament was supposed to receive an amended budget 2023 since June. ā€œIt isĀ  because of that commitment by the government of St. Maarten back in April, Ā  to provide an amended 2023 budget ASAP,Ā  that the CFT gave the final green light forĀ  the capital budget of government,Ā  in orderĀ  to get loans forĀ  the capital investmentsĀ  for the country.Ā  What is still necessary and needed to be includedĀ  in the amended budget 2023 would have been a multi annual projection of this capital budget.

ā€œGovernment does not even have the decency to tell us why we have not yet received the 2023 amendedĀ  budget. We have passed the halfway mark in this budgetary year that projectedĀ  over 500 million income for 2023 and that was basedĀ  on items like the Ā visitors’ tax forĀ  10 million guilders , ship registration fees, increase inĀ  theĀ  vehicle inspection fees, to name a few.

All of these were amounts which weĀ  queried as to their feasibility on short term, but these queries were discounted .

Right now it is anyone’s guess how close we areĀ  to these budgetary projections. Yet the government claims to have a (counter)proposal for debt refinancing, that it is keeping close to its chest. But when they get in a jam, by trying to outmaneuver their Dutch counterparts, then they know to run to parliament for support, MP Wescot concluded.

Verified by ExactMetrics